Checking a Licence in the Public Register, Including What 'White Label' Means
A licence number in a site footer verifies nothing by itself — it is text on a page the operator controls. The verification is a lookup in the Commission's own register, and it takes about a minute once you know which of the four files answers the question.
On this page
The four downloads
The Commission publishes the register as downloadable data files rather than only as a search box. The set is:
- business-licence-register-businesses.csv — the licensed companies themselves.
- business-licence-register-licences.csv — the licences held, by activity. This is by far the largest file, because one company commonly holds several.
- business-licence-register-trading-names.csv — the names a licensee trades under.
- business-licence-register-domain-names.csv — the website addresses attached to each account.
All four are also offered together as a single zip and as one consolidated spreadsheet that holds the business, domain and trading-name data in one file.
For the question most people actually have — is this website licensed in Britain — the domain names file is the one that answers it. Searching a company name first is the common mistake, because the company name is frequently not the name on the website.
The method
1. Take the bare domain from the address bar, without the protocol and without a www prefix.
2. Search the domain names file for it.
3. Read across to the licensee the domain is listed against — which may be a company you have never heard of.
4. Check that licensee in the licences file for the activities it is licensed for: a site offering slots and live tables needs a remote casino operating licence, and a site also taking bets needs a remote betting licence.
5. Check the status recorded against the licence.
The register updates within 24 hours when a licence ends, so a domain missing from the file on a site that is live and accepting British customers is the result worth acting on.
Why the company is not the brand
Two legitimate arrangements separate the two, and they are different from each other.
A trading name is the licensee operating under another name. Same company, same licence, different sign over the door, recorded in the trading names file.
A white label is a different thing: a third party's brand operating on the licensee's licence and infrastructure. The brand does the marketing and owns the look of the site; the licensee holds the licence and runs the regulated activity underneath it. The Commission's guidance on licensees' responsibilities for third parties is unambiguous about where the obligation lands: the responsibility for compliance of all operating gambling websites, including white labelled sites, sits with the licence holder and cannot be transferred to any other party. The licensee is also expected to conduct adequate due diligence on the third party to establish that it is competent and reliable, and to keep sufficient oversight and controls in place to ensure activities are carried out in accordance with the licence conditions. Failure to maintain adequate control of third parties can lead to regulatory action including suspension or loss of the operating licence.
For a player this has a practical reading. A white-label brand is not a lesser form of licensing — the licence is a real licence and the conditions apply in full — but the entity that owes the obligations, holds the customer funds and answers to the regulator is the licensee, not the brand. That is the name to note before depositing, and the name that matters if something goes wrong.
What the register does not tell you
It records licences, licensees, trading names and domains. It is not a quality rating, it says nothing about withdrawal speed or terms, and it does not record which brands share a platform or a wallet. And it is a record of the present state: a domain listed today was not necessarily listed last year, and vice versa.
| Site | Bonus code | Qualifying deposit |
|---|---|---|
| 10bet | No code | £10 |
| 777 Casino | Code 100WELCOME | £10 |
| 888 Casino | No code | £10 |
| BacanaPlay | No code | £10 |
| Jackpot City | No code | £20 |
| Karamba | No code | £20 |
| Luxury Casino | No code | £10 |
| MrQ | No code | £10 |
| PlayOJO | No code | £10 |
| Playzee | No code | £20 |
| Slots Magic | Code MAGIC | £10 |
| Spin Casino | No code | £20 |
| Swift Casino | No code | £10 |
| UK Casino Club | No code | £10 |
| Videoslots | No code | £10 |
| VoodooDreams | No code | £25 |
| Zodiac | No code | £1 |
A missed code is the single most common reason a welcome offer never appears in the account.
Frequently asked questions
Is a licence number printed in a site footer enough?
No. The footer is content the site publishes about itself. The number is useful as a lookup key, but the verification step is finding the domain in the register's own domain names file and reading the licensee and status from there.
Why would a licence be held by a company in a different country?
A remote operating licence is issued to the company that carries on the licensable activity for the British market, and that company may be incorporated outside Britain while holding a GB licence and complying with GB conditions. What matters for verification is that the licence is a Gambling Commission licence covering the activities the site offers, and that the domain is listed against it.
Should a third-party licence-checking tool be used instead?
There is no need for one, and an intermediary adds a point of failure between the question and the answer. The register's own files are published, free and updated by the Commission; the domain names file is the primary source and any tool is at best a copy of it.